n4_92Y_websiten4_92YTribeca_website
92Y Blog
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
Opposite the Editorial: Ignoring the Facts

image
Image from Indexed

Herbert Bayard Swope of The New York Evening World invented the op-ed in 1921 as “a catchall for book reviews, society boilerplate, and obituaries.” He wrote:

It occurred to me that nothing is more interesting than opinion when opinion is interesting, so I devised a method of cleaning off the page opposite the editorial, which became the most important in America...and thereon I decided to print opinions, ignoring facts.

On January 22, come to the Y to hear both David Shipley, op-ed editor, and letters editor Thomas Feyer of the New York Times provide tips and tricks to getting your name and ideas in print (you get $450 if they publish your piece!), as well as discuss whether op-eds shape opinion or are merely preaching to the converted. Bone up first with Shipley’s 2004 article in which he defines the op-ed section:

It’s sometimes easiest to define it in the negative. Op-Ed is different from the editorial page in that it does not represent the views of anyone in the editorial division, even its own editors. It is different from letters in that it is not a venue to debate articles that have appeared in The Times. It is different from the columnists in that, well, the columnists do their own thing.

These differences are important because Op-Ed, in some measure, is shaped by its neighbors. The Op-Ed editors tend to look for articles that cover subjects and make arguments that have not been articulated elsewhere in the editorial space. If the editorial page, for example, has a forceful, long-held view on a certain topic, we are more inclined to publish an Op-Ed that disagrees with that view. If you open the newspaper and find the editorial page and Op-Ed in lock step agreement or consistently writing on the same subject day after day, then we aren’t doing our job.

Since The Times began printing op-eds in 1970, the Grey Lady has featured such political luminaries as Madeleine Albright, Al Gore, and Donald Rumsfeld. John McCain wasn’t so fortunate. Not all opinions come in as prose, though: John Ashbery wrote a poem (”Infomercial 2”) and Dave Eggers drew a diagram (”Thanksgiving at Dan and Jane’s”).



Comments Reader Comments
There are no comments for this entry.

Post a Comment
Due to comment spam, comments are moderated and will appear on the site after review by the editors.

Name (required)
Email (required; will not be published)
Website

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

Email this item to a friend. Email this item to a friend.
The email address(es) that you supply to use this service will only be used to send the requested item.


Highlights from the
92nd Street Y and 92YTribeca universe.
About the 92nd Street Y
About 92YTribeca
Contact Us
Support Us

Sort By:
92nd Street Y Topics:
92nd Street Y News
The Arts
Humanities
Jewish Life
Family
Fitness
Interviews
Podcasts
Tell Me Why
92YTribeca Topics:
Music
Film
Theater
Comedy
Jewish Programs
Talks
Family Programs
Cafe
Tribeca Podcasts
Search 92Y Blog

Advanced Search
Archives
<   November 2009   >
s m t w t f s
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
Recent Entries
Next Week at 92YTribeca
Places of Interest When You Visit 92Y
We Didn’t Quite Hear You, Can You Repeat That Please?
Appetite City: A Journey Through the History of New York’s Restaurants
92Y Podcast: Ted Sorensen on John F. Kennedy
Subscribe
RSS Feed
Mobile Version
Email

UJA Federation of New York

Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Policies | Site Map | Help | Press Resources
© 2008 92nd Street Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association
All Rights Reserved. Click here for directions
Web Accessibility and the 92nd Street Y